Two-phase Flow Sizing Methodologies

Welcome to Inglenook's blog, Fireside Chats. Our goal for the blog is to address topics that may not be encountered everyday, but do deserve some consideration during efforts to ensure facilities are operating safely. Many "fireside chats" have led to great ideas, improvements, and opportunities. We hope these do too.

Two-phase Flow Sizing Methodologies

Monday, September 25, 2017

There are a number of methods available for estimating the capacity of a pressure relief valve for a two-phase relief fluid.1,2  One primary distinction among these methods is the means for representing fluid property behavior, which may exhibit any degree of thermodynamic and/or mechanical equilibrium.  In order to solve the nozzle mass flux integration (at least the vdP expression of it), one needs a relationship of the specific volume of the fluid with respect to pressure and the relative velocities of the two phases with respect to pressure.

There are two categories of approaches for obtaining the fluid properties3:

  1. Determine correlating parameters that are based on fluid properties at limited states (sometimes with a specification of how to obtain those fluid properties, such as thermodynamic constraints on flashes).  This approach allows one to only have limited physical property data, and typically allows one to solve the nozzle mass flux integration analytically (since the specific volume – pressure relationship is expressed as a function of the correlating parameters)
  2. Evaluate the nozzle flux integration numerically, determining the required fluid properties based on multiple successive flashes at each point required by the integration step size, with an appropriate constraint based on the expected behavior of the fluid (so for homogeneous fluid, this would ideally be an isentropic thermodynamic constraint).  This approach is deemed more rigorous (although there is still the unknown associated with the expected behavior of the fluid without testing) but requires access to a capable thermodynamic process simulator and appropriate fluid parameters / interaction coefficients.

We were presented with the following compilation of two-phase sizing methods and were asked to describe the differences.  The condensed version is provided in the table below.

Method

Properties, Integration

Constraints

Notes

API 520 – Part 1 §C.2.14

Category 2, Numeric

Isentropic

 

API 520 – Part 1 §C.2.2 4

Category 1, Analytic

Isentropic or isenthalpic

a

ISO 4126-10 §6.55

Category 1, Analytic

Isentropic or isenthalpic

b

TPHEM6

Category 1, Numeric

Isentropic

c

Darby2

Category 2, Numeric

Isentropic

 

Diener Schmidt7

Category 1, Analytic

Isentropic or isenthalpic

 

Fauske8

Category 1, Analytic

N/A

 

Leung (omega)9

Category 1, Analytic

1pt – N/A (implicitly isenthalpic)
2pt – Isentropic or isenthalpic

d


Note a: The two-point Omega method is used, see [9] Note b: The Diener-Schmidt method is used, see [7]
Note c: TPHEM is a program “Two-Phase Homogeneous Equilibrium Method” included with the CCPS Guidelines. A variety of empirical fitting equations are used, see [3]
Note d: Under certain conditions, the omega correlating parameter can be estimated using fluid properties from a single point (usually at relief conditions)

For information on selection of the discharge coefficient for two-phase flow, see our blog Relief Device Discharge Coefficient for Non-ideal Flow


[1] Darby R, Meiller PR, Stockton JR. Select the best model for two-phase relief sizing. Chemical Engineering Progress, May 2001: 56-64.
[2] Darby R, Self FE, Edwards VH. Properly size pressure-relief valves for two-phase flow. Chemical Engineering, June 2002: 68-74.
[3] Simpson LL. Navigating the Two-Phase Maze. International Symposium on Runaway Reactions and Pressure Relief Design. Fisher HG and Melhem GA (eds), Boston, MA, AIChE, Aug 2-4, 1995: 394-417.
[4] American Petroleum Institute. “API Standard 520: Sizing, Selection, and Installation of Pressure-relieving Devices in Refineries; Part I—Sizing and Selection”. 9th Edition, 2014.
[5] International Standards Organization. “ISO 4126-10:2010: Safety devices for protection against excessive pressure; Part 10 – Sizing of safety valves for gas/liquid two-phase flow”. 1st Edition, 2010.
[6] American Institute for Chemical Engineers, Center for Chemical Process Safety. “CCPS Guidelines for Pressure Relief and Effluent Handling”. 1st Edition, 1998.
[7] Diener R, Schmidt J. Sizing of throttling device for gas/liquid two-phase flow – Part 1: Safety valves, Process Safety Progress, 2004; 23 (4): 335-344.
[8] Fauske HK, Determine two-phase flows during releases, Chemical Engineering Progress, Feb 1999: 55-58.
[9] Leung JC. Easily size relief devices and piping for two-phase flow. Chemical Engineering Progress. Dec 1996: 28-50.

0 Comments
Post has no comments.
Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *