Control valve flow (CCPS GPREH2 trim)

Welcome to Inglenook's blog, Fireside Chats. Our goal for the blog is to address topics that may not be encountered everyday, but do deserve some consideration during efforts to ensure facilities are operating safely. Many "fireside chats" have led to great ideas, improvements, and opportunities. We hope these do too.

Tuesday, June 23, 2026

For excess inflow into a system, the flow rate entering the system from a higher pressure source can be determined based on the flow limiting element between the high pressure source and the system of…

Read More »
Tuesday, June 23, 2026

For excess inflow into a system, the flow rate entering the system from a higher pressure source can be determined based on the flow limiting element between the high pressure source and the system of…

Read More »
Thursday, June 18, 2026

In Orifice Flow for Subcooled Flashing Liquids and Orifice Flow for Two-Phase Fluids – Part 1, we outlined our effort to verify a calculation model for two-phase orifice flow using the data of Richardson, et…

Read More »
Friday, July 17, 2020

We have continued our effort to verify a calculation model for use with determining the flow rates of two-phase fluid through orifices based on the data of Richardson, et al.1 In that work, they have…

Read More »
Thursday, July 25, 2019

In the event of an imbalance in the volumetric flows in and out of a container, a change of pressure can result within the container. The flow rate entering and exiting the container can be determined using common engineering calculation techniques, either by evaluating the capacity of a single limiting source term or single piping component, multiple piping components in series, the limitations of a fluid driver, or the combined effect of the fluid driver and the intervening piping system. Several cases of overpressure scenarios are evaluated in this manner, including heat exchanger tube failure, inlet control valve failure, and inadvertent valve opening.

Read More »
Monday, June 24, 2019

For heat input to two phase systems with a phase change, the vaporization of the liquid forms the basis for the required relief rate, ignoring the expansion of the individual phases. For these systems, the…

Read More »
Sunday, June 23, 2019

For heat input to two phase systems without a phase change, the expansion of the individual phases causes a displacement of the phase in contact with the relief device, and that displacement is the basis…

Read More »
Saturday, June 22, 2019

For heat input to single phase systems, the heat input, heat capacity, and cubic expansion coefficient are used to obtain a required relief rate. The relief requirements discussed below are for heating or cooling of…

Read More »
Friday, June 21, 2019

When heat is transferred to a liquid that can vaporize, the phase change is usually the most significant contributor to the overall change in density, and any individual phase expansions are typically ignored. One key…

Read More »
Thursday, June 20, 2019

When heat is transferred to or from a single phase fluid, that fluid will expand or contract, and the isobaric cubic expansion coefficient is used to characterize that expansion. Usually this expansion coefficient is taken…

Read More »